Skip to content
Meet BRON
Arrange a meeting

For litigation teams

Litigation. Held together.

The preparation builds while you work.

Example question · Send it or write your own

Show the proof gaps to cover in Smith’s deposition.
*
More questions

Build the case

Prepare the room

Run the matter

Run the firm

Arrange a meetingExplore the sample

North Harbor *

Prepare the next examination.

Review Smith’s prior answer, the contrary account and the email beside the questions they prompt.

Read Smith’s accountWatch the film · 1:17
Sample assignment
North Harbor / Smith’s examinationPrepared for review
View as
Sample document view

Examination plan

Smith’s examination

You testified that the supplier learned of the defect “Only after May 4.” What correspondence did you review before giving that answer? (Smith Dep. 44:12)

Garcia testified that the supplier knew “Before May 4.” How do you account for that testimony? (Garcia Dep. 118:4)

Proposed exhibit: the May 2 email with defect-report.pdf. Do you recognize it? When did you receive it, and when did you first read it? (defect-email.eml)

What remains open

Receipt and reading remain unconfirmed. Request Smith’s copy, delivery records and the review-meeting notes.

North Harbor · attorney work product · sample
Correct a recorded date

Controlled variation

One recorded date changes.

Suppose an earlier draft recorded May 3 as the email’s send date. The original shows May 2. Correcting that fact should bring the work that relied on it back into view.

Before the correction

May 3, 2025

Earlier draft · misrecorded send date. The original email is unchanged.

Recorded send date
May 3 · earlier entry
Notice memorandum
Relies on the earlier entry
Witness accounts
Both retained · still disputed

Illustration of fact-reliance review. Document-version checks run daily and cover recorded reliance; they do not automatically rewrite work.

Choose a meeting time. You can optionally create an account to keep your sample selection.

Arrange a meetingCreate an account (optional)

One matter, connected

BRON gets more useful as you work the matter.

What the firm learns, prepares and decides stays with the matter. The next assignment can draw on that accumulated work.

In Chambers and Desk, counsel directs the work, reviews the result and decides what comes next.

North Harbor

Question the evidence. See what is still open.

Sources and research take shape as you work, so the next question starts with what you already know.

North Harbor / notice

Chronology

Disputed
Agreement §9.2Notice by May 4, 2025
  1. Garcia sent the defect report to Smith
    defect-email.eml

    May 2, 2025, 9:14 AM · defect-report.pdf attached. The email does not establish when Smith received or read it.

  2. Garcia testified the supplier knew before May 4
    Garcia Dep. 118:4–12

    “Before May 4.” The supplier knew of the defect before May 4. Garcia attended the review meeting.

  3. Smith testified the supplier knew only after May 4
    Smith Dep. 44:12–20

    “Only after May 4.” The supplier knew of the defect only after May 4. Smith relies on correspondence he reviewed.

Still openWhen Smith received or read the email
North Harbor · Fact-to-element matrix

What does the record say about notice?

Requirement§9.2 · Written notice

Written notice of a defect within 30 days of delivery

Supply agreement · §9.2
Supporting record

Garcia sent Smith the defect report on May 2.

defect-email.eml · May 2, 2025, 9:14 AM

The send date does not establish receipt or reading.

Adverse account

Smith testified the supplier learned of the defect “Only after May 4.”

Smith Dep. 44:12–20
Still to establish

When did Smith receive or read the email?

Seek Smith’s copy and delivery records
Related testimony

Garcia says the supplier knew before May 4. Knowledge alone does not establish written notice. Garcia Dep. 118:4–12

From the chronology

  1. Defect report sent defect-email.eml
  2. Garcia: “Before May 4.” Garcia Dep. 118:4
  3. Smith: “Only after May 4.” Smith Dep. 44:12
Explore the chronology Explore the evidence matrix

The client, in context

Bring in what the matter needs.

Ask for missing material and review what comes back alongside the question it may help answer.

Explore Collector Client experience Discovery
CLIENT / North Harbor

The original notice email.

From Elena Rivera
to Garcia
THE REQUEST

Find the original notice email, its attachment and any review-meeting notes.

GARCIA / CLIENT
EXAMPLE GUIDANCEGarcia: Which files does my team need?BRON: The original email, its attachment and any review-meeting notes. Let your team know if something is missing.

Named sources accepted in BRON for Mac.

Returned to the matter
defect-email.emlGarcia → Smith · May 2, 2025, 9:14 AM
defect-report.pdfAttachment
WITH ELENA RIVERA

Awaiting attorney review · When Smith received or read the email remains open.

Counsel's judgment

Know what your decision rests on.

Test the opposing case against the sources and open questions, then carry your approach into later work.

Saved valuation / illustrativeNotice disputed
Recorded basis

What does the range rest on?

Illustrative p10–p90 · conditional recovery
$1.2m$3.6m
Inspect the model and scenario
Contrary accountsGarcia Dep. 118:4
Smith Dep. 44:12
Written notice / §9.2Written notice of a defect within 30 days of delivery
War game / conditional scenario

If Smith’s account prevails

Test the notice assumption against the saved position.

Red Brief / opposing case

Was written notice of the defect given by May 4, 2025?

Next proof questionWhen Smith received or read the email?defect-email.eml · sent May 2, 2025, 9:14 AM. Sending does not establish receipt or reading.

Counsel reviews what each source supports. Neither account decides the notice issue.

Explore strategyExplore security

Preparation carries forward

Start the next assignment further along.

Draw on reviewed work and counsel’s recorded approach instead of reconstructing the case. Trial preparation is in development.

Explore trial preparation Test the position
EXAMINATION PREPARATION

Smith · notice of defect

For counsel review
PROPOSED OUTLINE
01
Prior accountWhat did you know, and when?

“Only after May 4.” Smith Dep. 44:12

02
Follow-upWhen did you receive or read the email?

Sending is recorded; receipt and reading remain open.

Proposed work · opening a plan does not adopt it

The work continues

Keep the practice moving.

Review the next steps, client communication and time preparation with the matter in view.

Explore Your Day Client experience
MATTER WORK / North Harbor

From the matter to the next step.

Elena RiveraSupervising attorney
MATTER ACTIVITY

Documents returned for review

Garcia returned the original notice email and its attachment.

defect-email.emldefect-report.pdf attached
Awaiting attorney review
CLIENT UPDATEPROPOSED

“We received the email and defect report. Counsel will review the originals and the next evidence question.”

For North Harbor Review before sharing
TIME / PROPOSED DESCRIPTIONReview returned notice email and attachment
Duration to confirm

Verification

Check a filing.

Change a source in the example and see what fails. File integrity and source checks do not establish legal correctness or completeness.

Try the checks
Explore all 17 product areas

Across your practice

The full product
Follow the connected matterClaims, evidence, strategy, trial and resolution

Explore the example, assignments, clients and product areas.

Follow the matter tour · Explore all features

Security and review controls

What BRON checks for you, and what waits for a person.

Security overviewSub-processorsCheck an exported file
Source passages

Click a sentence in a draft to open the passage it cites, wherever BRON can locate it. Whether it supports the sentence is still yours to judge.

Unconfirmed citations

If a cited authority cannot be confirmed, the document is held when someone tries to send, sign, file, export or share it. Only a licensed attorney at the firm can release it, and the release is recorded with their reason. If the check cannot run at all, nothing is released.

Approval before release

Nothing is sent, signed or filed, no trust money moves, and no matter changes phase until someone on the matter approves that exact action. Phase changes, deadlines and sharing documents with a client need a licensed attorney.

Client document access

Clients see only documents an attorney has reviewed and shared. Privileged and work-product material never reaches the client portal.

Decision log

Approvals and other key acts are added to the matter's log, which can be checked for tampering.

Feature availability

Every feature page says what is available, what is limited and what is in development.

Getting started

Explore the sample while your firm’s access is reviewed. Your firm’s own work starts after approval and setup.

Setup and accessThe evaluation brief
  1. Choose a time and confirm your meeting.
  2. Optionally create an account to explore the sample.
  3. Agree the assignment, setup, scope and terms.
  4. BRON sets up your firm and invites its principal.

Bring one assignment.

Choose work your team handles regularly. See what BRON can prepare from the matter, what carries forward and what needs your decision.

Arrange a meeting

30 minutes. No account required. Keep confidential matter information out of the booking form.